Center for Studying Health System Change

Providing Insights that Contribute to Better Health Policy

Advanced Search Instructions

You can refine your search with the following modifiers:

* Use an to perform a wildcard search.Example: prescript* would return "prescription", "prescriptions" etc.
"" Use quotes to match a phrase.Example: "prescription drug" only returns results where the words are next to each other.
+ Use a plus sign to perform a search where the additional term MUST be part of the page.Example: prescription +drug
- Use a minus sign to perform a search where the additional term SHOULD NOT be part of the page.Example: prescription -drug
< > Use a < > sign to perform a search where the additional term should be of greater or lesser importance in the search.Example: prescription >drug
Find pages with the word precription with additional importance for the word drug.
( ) Use parentheses to group different search terms together.Example: prescription (+medicare -drug)
 

Insurance Coverage & Costs Costs The Uninsured Private Coverage Employer Sponsored Individual Public Coverage Medicare Medicaid and SCHIP Access to Care Quality & Care Delivery Health Care Markets Issue Briefs Data Bulletins Research Briefs Policy Analyses Community Reports Journal Articles Other Publications Surveys Site Visits Design and Methods Data Files


 
 

Stephen H. Long

 
 

M. Susan Marquis

 
     
 
 

Tracking Health Care Costs:

November 1999
Issue Brief No. 23
 
 

Despite Fears, Costs Rise Only Modestly in 1998

Fall 1998
Data Bulletin No. 13
 
 

Trends in Offering Employer-Sponsored Coverage

Fall 1998
Data Bulletin No. 15
 
 

Tracking Health Care Costs:

September/October 1998
Health Affairs
 
     

Trends in the Cost of Employer-Sponsored Coverage

Data Bulletin No. 14
Fall 1998
M. Susan Marquis, Stephen H. Long

Cost of Employer-Sponsored Insurance

Site Average 1-Year Change
Orange County, Calif. 0.2%
Cleveland, Ohio1.1
Miami, Fla. 1.1
Boston, Mass. 1.6
Phoenix, Ariz. 1.8
Lansing, Mich. 2.0
Syracuse, N.Y. 2.1
Seattle, Wash. 2.4
Indianapolis, Ind. 2.6
Newark, N.J. 3.0
Greenville, S.C. 3.3
Little Rock, Ark. 3.8
United States1.9
Employer-reported premium increases weighted by employer size. None of the site changes are significantly different from the U.S. mean at the p<0.05 level. 1997 RWJF Employer Health Insurance Survey

ncreases in the cost of employer-sponsored health insurance have been quite moderate in recent years, in contrast to the double-digit growth rates in the late 1980s and early 1990s. In 1997, premiums increased on average only 1.9 percent over the previous year, according to employers that participated in the 1997 Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (RWJF) Employer Health Insurance Survey. Other recent employer surveys also report moderate cost increases nationwide for 1997 and 1998.

Variation by community was modest, and there was only a 3.6 percentage point difference in cost increases among the 12 randomly selected sites in the Community Tracking Study, with a low of 0.2 percent in Orange County and a high of 3.8 percent in Little Rock.

Distribution of Cost Changes Among Employers
Chart - Chart - Distribution of Cost Changes Among Employers
1997 RWJF Employer Health Insurance Survey

espite the low level of cost increase overall and modest variation among communities, there was substantial variation in cost changes among employers. Thirty-seven percent of employers that offer health insurance reported no change in their 1997 costs (see graph). But 19 percent of employers offering insurance reported that the cost of their plans in 1997 was more than 10 percent higher than the previous year, and 7 percent reported that the cost of providing coverage fell by more than 10 percent.

Small employers experienced greater variation in premium changes than large employers. Thirty-four percent of firms with fewer than 10 employees reported changes in excess of 10 percent: 26 percent reported increases and the remaining 8 percent reported decreases. Among employers with 100 or more employees, reports of changes exceeding 10 percent in either direction were only about half as common (19 percent) as in small businesses.

Changes in Premiums in Excess of 10 Percent by Firm Size
Chart - Changes in Premiums in Excess of 10 Percent by Firm Size
1997 RWJF Employer Health Insurance Survey

COST ISSUES TO CONSIDER

he extent to which the moderate cost growth documented here reflects efforts by employers to contain costs, as distinct from other causes, requires further investigation. For example, the reported changes in premiums do not account for factors that may contribute to the small increase in costs, such as changes in benefit design, the types of plans offered by employers and the types of plans chosen by employees.

Moreover, the modest overall growth masks substantial increases in the costs faced by some individual employers, especially small firms. If these increases lead to employers’ dropping insurance as a benefit or increasing what employees pay, employees in these firms may have less access to health insurance.

This Data Bulletin presents results from the 1997 Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Employer Health Insurance Survey, a nationally representative telephone survey of private and public employers. It is based on responses of 21,543 private establishments. The survey is a component of Health System Change’s (HSC’s) Community Tracking Study. It was conducted by Research Triangle Institute (RTI) and designed by RAND and RTI, with collaboration from HSC.

 

Back to Top