Providing Insights that Contribute to Better Health Policy
Insurance Coverage & Costs Access to Care Quality & Care Delivery Health Care Markets Issue Briefs Data Bulletins Research Briefs Policy Analyses Community Reports Journal Articles Other Publications Surveys Site Visits Design and Methods Data Files
Specialty Hospital Building Boom Threatens General Hospitals
Competition Heats Up For Profitable Cardiac and Orthopedic Services
FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT:
ASHINGTON, D.C.—General hospitals fear a rise in physician-owned specialty hospitals will siphon off the most profitable patients, leaving them with the sickest, costliest patients, according to a study released today by the HSC.
Advocates contend specialty hospitals can improve quality and reduce costs by increasing productivity through a "focused-factory" approach where physicians perform a high volume of a narrow range of procedures. But skeptics worry specialty hospitals and their physician investors will "cream skim" the most profitable patients away from general hospitals, cutting into bottom lines and threatening the cross-subsidization of unprofitable services such as emergency care and other essential services.
"The specialty hospital building boom and intense competition for profitable cardiac and orthopedic services are signs that were paying too much for these procedures and perhaps not paying enough for other services," said Paul B. Ginsburg, Ph.D., a co-author of the study and president of HSC, a nonpartisan policy research organization funded exclusively by The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.
"Government and private payers may inadvertently be sending the wrong signals to the marketplace and encouraging excess capacity for these high-profit services at the expense of less profitable services such as emergency care," Ginsburg said.
In theory, using a focused-factory approach in health care can potentially improve quality, increase productivity and lower costs, but if the payment system is distorted, specialty hospitals can prosper financially without achieving the goals of higher quality and increased productivity.
While the United States has a long history of certain types of specialty hospitals, including childrens and rehabilitation hospitals, stand-alone heart and orthopedic hospitals are relatively new and growing rapidly. While no comprehensive national data exists about the number of heart and orthopedic specialty hospitals, 11 specialty hospitals have emerged since 1997 in the 12 local markets tracked intensively by HSC researchers. Other sources estimate that 50 to 100 specialty hospitals are operating across the country, with more on the way.
"The concern is when more hospitals compete for the same or lower volume of services, quality may decline and costs may increase because each hospital has less volume and excess capacity is rarely eliminated," said HSC Researcher Kelly Devers, Ph.D., the studys lead author. "When theres excess capacity, more procedures may be performed, whether they need to be or not."
According to the study, three factors appear to be driving the specialty hospital boom:
The studys findings are detailed in an HSC Issue Brief—Specialty Hospitals: Focused Factories or Cream Skimmers?—is available here. The study was released at an HSC conference today featuring public and private sector experts on the issue, and a conference transcript will be available soon on the HSC Web site.
General hospitals have responded to the competitive threat posed by specialty hospitals in a variety of ways, including:
The rapid rise of specialty hospitals has put the issue on state and federal policy makers radar screens. Existing federal law limits physicians ability to refer Medicare and Medicaid patients to health care facilities, such as clinical laboratories, in which they have a financial interest, but the law exempts physician investment in whole hospitals. Recently introduced federal legislation would continue to allow physicians to refer patients to a hospital in which they have an ownership interest, but only if the interest was purchased on terms also available to the general public.
Along with limiting the exemption in federal physician self-referral law and
revising Medicare payment formulas, proposals include: requiring specialty hospitals
to accept Medicaid and indigent patients; requiring the same quality and patient-safety
standards for specialty and general hospitals; requiring specialty hospitals
to have full-service emergency departments; and enacting certificate-of-need
laws aimed at curbing excess capacity.
The Center for Studying Health System Change is a nonpartisan policy research organization committed to providing objective and timely insights on the nations changing health system to help inform policy makers and contribute to better health care policy. HSC, based in Washington, D.C., is funded exclusively by The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation and is affiliated with Mathematica Policy Research, Inc.