Data Bulletin No. 30
July 2005
Joy M. Grossman, Marie C. Reed
doption of clinical information technology (IT) in physicians practices has the potential to improve quality and reduce the cost of care for people with complex health problems, including many Medicare patients. Monitoring adoption trends and assessing gaps in Medicare patients access to physicians with clinical IT are important as policy makers try to speed IT adoption. A majority of Medicare fee-for-service outpatient visits in 2001 were to physicians without significant IT support for patient care, according to a new baseline analysis of Medicare claims data linked to the Community Tracking Study (CTS) Physician Survey. At the same time, more vulnerable beneficiaries, including those who were sicker, living in low-income or rural areas, or who were black, did not have significant differences in access to physicians with clinical IT.
More than half of Medicare outpatient visits (57%) were to physicians in practices that used IT for no more than one of the following five clinical functions: obtaining treatment guidelines, exchanging clinical data with other physicians, accessing patient notes, generating preventive treatment reminders for the physicians use, and writing prescriptions. Access rates across individual clinical functions varied considerably. While half of Medicare outpatient visits were to practices using IT to obtain treatment guidelines, the proportion of visits to practices with IT support for other patient care functions was much lower, falling to 9 percent of visits to practices with electronic prescribing (see Table 1). Medicare beneficiaries limited access to physicians with clinical IT mirrors the general population, since it reflects physicians slow rate of IT adoption.1
Table 1
|
|||||
Access Treatment Guidelines
|
Exchange Clinical Data with Other Physicians
|
Access Patient Notes
|
Generate Preventive Care Reminders
|
Electronic Prescribing
|
|
All |
49%
|
33%
|
30%
|
23%
|
9%
|
Healthiest Third2 |
52
|
34
|
30
|
22
|
9
|
Middle Third |
78*
|
33
|
30
|
23
|
9
|
Sickest Third |
48*
|
32*
|
29
|
24*
|
9
|
1 Patient health status as measured by the
Klabunde index of relative comorbidity. For details see endnote 2. 2 Reference group. * Comparison with reference group is statistically significant at p <.05. Source: Linked data from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services 2001 5 Percent Carrier File and 2001 CTS Physician Survey |
he sickest Medicare patients are likely to benefit the most from seeing physicians using clinical IT because of the complexity of their cases and the need for care coordination. While access to physicians using IT was low for all beneficiaries, there were few differences in access between sicker and healthier beneficiaries. For example, across the five clinical functions, there were only small differences in the percentage of outpatient visits to physicians using IT between the sickest third of Medicare patientsas measured by a comorbidity index2and the healthiest third. Similar results were found for outpatient visits by the frail elderly—those 85 and older—and by beneficiaries eligible for Medicare because of disability. However, there were substantial differences for patients with end-stage renal disease that vary by clinical IT function (see Supplementary Table 1).
Some policy makers are concerned that patients in rural areas or underserved low-income urban areas are less likely to have access to physicians with clinical IT because these providers may be slower to adopt IT. However, outpatient visits by Medicare patients living in rural or lowincome areas were as likely as or, in a few instances, more likely than those in urban or more affluent areas to be with physicians in practices using IT (see Table 2). And, visits by black patients were as likely to be to physicians in practices with IT as visits by white patients.
Table 2
|
|||||
Access Treatment Guidelines
|
Exchange Clinical Data with Other Physicians
|
Access Patient Notes
|
Generate Preventive Care Reminders
|
Electronic Prescribing
|
|
Location of Patient Residence1 | |||||
Urban2 |
48%
|
34%
|
28%
|
22%
|
9%
|
Rural |
52
|
32
|
35*
|
26*
|
10
|
Neighborhood Income in 20001 | |||||
Wealthiest Quartile2 |
47
|
33
|
26
|
23
|
9
|
3rd Quartile |
48
|
33
|
30*
|
23
|
9
|
2nd Quartile |
52
|
36
|
32*
|
24
|
9
|
Poorest Quartile |
50
|
31
|
30*
|
23
|
9
|
Race | |||||
White2 |
49
|
33
|
29
|
23
|
9
|
Black |
48
|
33
|
32
|
21
|
9
|
Other |
48
|
34
|
31
|
27
|
10
|
1 Patient zip code of residence was used
to determine urban/rural location and neighborhood income. Urban refers
to metropolitan areas defined by the Office of Management and Budget. Income
data are from the U.S. Bureau of the Census. 2 Reference group. * Comparison with reference group is statistically significant at p <.05. Source: Linked data from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services 2001 5 Percent Carrier File and 2001 CTS Physician Survey |
hile patient characteristics are only loosely associated with the likelihood that Medicare outpatient visits will be to physicians in practices using clinical IT, multivariate analysis suggests that physician characteristics are far more important. In particular, practice settingespecially practice sizeand, to a lesser extent, physician specialty played far more important roles in predicting whether outpatient visits were to physicians with clinical IT (see Supplementary Table 2). More than three-fourths of Medicare outpatient visits were to physicians in practices with fewer than 50 physicians, the practices that are least likely to adopt clinical IT. Currently, Medicare is targeting some efforts to speed IT adoption at smaller practices, including technical assistance and a chronic-care payfor- performance demonstration. Broader policy effortsincluding financial incentivesmay be needed, however, to substantially improve patient access. Policy makers also will need to monitor trends to assure that patients who can benefit most from clinical IT have access to physicians using these tools.
1. | Reed, Marie C., and Joy M. Grossman, Limited Information Technology for Patient Care in Physician Offices, Issue Brief No. 89, Center for Studying Health System Change, Washington, D.C. (September 2004). |
2. | Comorbidity is a measure of the relative number and severity of health conditions, such as diabetes and hypertension, that may cause or aggravate other conditions. The Klabunde relative comorbidity index was calculated from all claims in the 2001 5 Percent Carrier File. See Klabunde, Carrie N., et al., Development of a Comorbidity Index Using Physician Claims Data, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, Vol. 53, No. 12, (December 2000). |
Supplemental Table 1 - Medicare Outpatient
Visits to Physicians in Practices with IT Support for Specific Patient Care
Functions in 2001, by Patient Age and Medicare Eligibility
Supplemental Table 2 - Adjusted Odds Ratios
for Likelihood of Medicare Outpatient Visits to Physicians in Practices with
IT to Support Specific Patient Care Functions in 2001