Insurance Coverage & Costs
Costs
The Uninsured
Private Coverage
Employer Sponsored
Individual
Public Coverage
Medicare
Medicaid and SCHIP
Access to Care
Quality & Care Delivery
Health Care Markets
Issue Briefs
Data Bulletins
Research Briefs
Policy Analyses
Community Reports
Journal Articles
Other Publications
Surveys
Site Visits
Design and Methods
Data Files
|
||
Monitoring Market Change: Findings from the Community Tracking Study: Health Services Research |
||
Monitoring Market Change: Findings from the Community Tracking Study: Health Services Research |
||
Monitoring Market Change: Findings from the Community Tracking Study: Health Services Research |
||
Association Leaders Speak Out on Health System Change Health Affairs |
||
The Community Snapshots Project Compilation of Snapshots |
||
Snapshots of Change in Fifteen Communities:
Health System Integration: A Means to an End
Summer 1996
Health Affairs, vol.15, no.2 (Summer 1996): 92-106
Robert Miller
he creation of integrated firms and contractual networks in health
care often is a precondition for other forms of integration that could actually lower
costs and improve quality of care. Although different types of integration activities are
leading to innovations in the production of services and the care of populations, the
continued influence of the "old" indemnity insurance/fee-for-service system
creates important obstacles to those integration activities. If creation of integrated
firms and contractual networks races ahead of other forms of integration, it could produce
noncompetitive markets that reduce pressures to integrate in ways that can cut costs and
improve quality of care. Purchasers’ actions could play a major role in determining the
future of various integration activities.
Free access to this article is available at the Health Affairs Web site.
