Insurance Coverage & Costs Access to Care Quality & Care Delivery Health Care Markets Issue Briefs Data Bulletins Research Briefs Policy Analyses Community Reports Journal Articles Other Publications Surveys Site Visits Design and Methods Data Files |
Managed Care Backlash Ebbs as Consumer Confidence in Health Care Inches UpPeople in Poor Health Remain Much Less Likely to Trust Health Care SystemNews Release
FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT: ASHINGTON, D.C.—Privately insured consumers confidence in the health care system increased slightly between 1997 and 2001, signaling that people have noticed the easing of managed care restrictions, according to a national tracking study issued today by the Center for Studying Health System Change (HSC). "In response to the managed care backlash, many health plans have included more providers in their networks and eased restrictions on care, and consumers have noticed the changes," said Paul B. Ginsburg, Ph.D., president of HSC, a nonpartisan policy research organization funded exclusively by The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. But Ginsburg cautioned that "increased choice and fewer care restrictions come at a cost, and consumers may become more anxious as they are asked to shoulder more costs. Instead of worrying about managed care plans denying needed care, consumers may soon worry more about how they will afford needed care." The studys findings are detailed in a new HSC Tracking Report—Who Do You Trust? Americans Perspectives on Health Care, 1997-2001. Based on results from HSCs Community Tracking Study Household Survey, a nationally representative survey involving about 60,000 people in 33,000 families, key findings include:
Despite signs of increased overall consumer confidence, the study found peoples trust of the health care system varied significantly depending on their health. People in poorer health are likely to interact more frequently with the health care system, creating more opportunities for them to have problems. About half of consumers in fair to poor health—those most likely to need and use medical care—believed health plans strongly influenced medical decision-making in 2001, compared with 43 percent of people in good health. Twenty percent of people in fair to poor health worried about getting needed specialty referrals in 2001, compared with nearly 13 percent of people in good health. "We didnt find an increase in trust in the health care system among people in fair to poor health. Its clear that people in poorer health are less trusting of the health care system, and recent marketplace changes have not eased their concerns," said Marie C. Reed, M.H.S., an HSC health research analyst who co-authored the study with HSC Senior Researcher Sally Trude, Ph.D. The study also found about 45 percent of all privately insured Americans in 2001 continued to believe their doctors were strongly influenced by health insurance company rules when making decisions about their care. In 2001, nearly half of people enrolled in HMOs believed their health plan strongly influenced their doctors decisions, compared with less than 40 percent of people in other types of plans. Over time, however, HMO members concerns about health plan influence in medical decision-making declined slightly. Americans satisfaction with their choice of primary care physicians in their health plan increased between 1997 and 2001, while satisfaction with their choice of specialists remained about the same. Finally, fewer people reported changing plans and health care providers. Gail Shearer, director of health policy analysis, Consumers Union, www.consumersunion.org Karen Ignagni, president and CEO, American Association of Health Plans, www.aahp.org Jack C. Ebeler, president, Alliance of Community Health Plans, www.achp.org The Center for Studying Health System Change is a nonpartisan policy research organization committed to providing objective and timely research on the nations changing health system to help inform policy makers and contribute to better health care policy. HSC, based in Washington, D.C., is funded exclusively by The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation and affiliated with Mathematica Policy Research, Inc. |
||