![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() Syracuse Faces Rising Health Costs; Hospital Competition GrowsCommunity Report No. 9
In June 2005, a team of researchers visited Syracuse, N.Y., to study that community’s health system, how it is changing and the effects of those changes on consumers. The Center for Studying Health System Change (HSC), as part of the Community Tracking Study, interviewed more than 65 leaders in the health care market. Syracuse is one of 12 communities tracked by HSC every two years through site visits. Individual community reports are published for each round of site visits. The first four site visits to Syracuse, in 1996, 1998, 2000 and 2003, provide trend information against which changes are tracked. The Syracuse market encompasses Onondaga, Oswego and Madison counties.
Other noteworthy developments include:
Hospital Competition Grows as Crouse Hospital Recovers
Competition among the area hospitals has intensified as Crouse Hospital strives to regain lost market share. Because of its financial problems, Crouse Hospital lost market share to other hospitals, notably to St. Joseph’s Hospital Health Center and University Hospital-Upstate University Hospital at Syracuse. Market share shifts occurred as physicians, concerned about Crouse Hospital’s bankruptcy, sought admitting privileges or moved a greater share of their admissions to other hospitals in the community. However, market observers expect that Crouse’s newly appointed CEO, Paul Kronenberg, a longstanding and highly respected physician from the hospital medical staff, will solidify physicians’ trust in the hospital’s recovery and help the hospital reclaim lost ground. Despite its recent financial gains, Crouse Hospital faces longer-term challenges because of its aged physical plant, debt payments and lagging investments in information technology. Because of the physical proximity and complementary service niches of Crouse Hospital and University Hospital-Upstate University Hospital, expectations for a potential merger persist despite union opposition and cultural differences between the two organizations. Crouse Hospital lacks cardiac surgery, which University Hospital provides. University Hospital lacks obstetrics, which Crouse offers, and University Hospital is developing a pediatric hospital, which is a natural link to Crouse’s high-risk neonatal care services. A consultant, paid for by the Metropolitan Development Association and Excellus BlueCross BlueShield during Crouse Hospital’s bankruptcy, has recommended the development of shared services rather than a full-scale merger between Crouse Hospital and University Hospital-Upstate University Hospital. While there is skepticism in the community whether significant collaboration will occur, some are optimistic that these collaborations will be fueled by concerns about Gov. George Pataki’s newly formed commission to evaluate and recommend hospital capacity reduction and closures. In the last two years, there has been little hospital facility renovation and no expansion in hospital capacity in Syracuse. Several capital improvements remain in the planning stage. For example, Crouse Hospital is completing renovation of its intensive care unit (ICU) and kidney dialysis unit and plans to increase its number of operating suites. University Hospital-Upstate University Hospital at Syracuse has $100 million that the state certificate-of-need agency approved for construction of a children’s hospital. In addition, St. Joseph’s Hospital Health Center has a six-to-eight year master plan to rebuild the entire campus of the hospital and convert it to private rooms. Higher Utilization Rates Spur Cost Growth in Syracuse
However, the pace of development of new physician-owned facilities and the acquisition of new equipment has slowed over the past two years, and some market observers suggest that the market may have reached saturation—a natural limit on the number of facilities the market can support given population size and the demand for health services. Rather than adding new services, large physician practices reportedly are refining current service offerings. Meanwhile, Excellus BlueCross BlueShield, the not-for-profit insurer with roughly 70 percent market share, has refrained from aggressively curbing cost growth by squeezing provider payment rates or managing utilization to avoid antagonizing physicians. Maintaining a broad provider network remains Excellus’ key competitive strategy against significant market entry by national health plans, such as Aetna and UnitedHealthcare. However, physicians continue to distrust Excellus BlueCross BlueShield, likely because of Excellus’ potential market clout. Excellus recently settled a lawsuit filed by the Medical Society of New York against area health plans, which claimed that health plans made it difficult for physicians to understand the plans’ billing and payment practices. As Excellus has consolidated acquisitions, it has worked to standardize its claim billing processes to a resource-based relative value system (RBRVS), although different products use different claims coding procedures currently. In the meantime, these billing procedures and resulting reimbursement have confused and frustrated physicians. As part of the lawsuit settlement, Excellus has agreed to show physicians its fees, policies and procedures on its Web site. In addition, if Excellus adds a product that results in a change in fees, physicians have the right to opt out of that product. Community-based Efforts Form to Reduce Health Care Costs
At the same time, employers have faced a fifth year of double-digit premium increases. Two years ago, heightened price competition among insurers helped moderate premium increases, although some respondents questioned insurers’ ability to maintain lower premiums given rising cost pressures. At that time, HealthNow, a subsidiary of Buffalo-based BlueCross BlueShield of Western New York, entered the market with premiums reportedly 10 percent to 15 percent lower than its health plan competitors and gained enrollment from some small and mid-size employers. Although it offered relatively attractive premiums, its provider network did not match the breadth of its chief rival, Excellus BlueCross BlueShield. New leadership at HealthNow’s parent company, however, was unwilling to weather the additional losses required for this expansion into the Syracuse market and raised premiums 33 percent, on average, for 2005. As a result, HealthNow has lost most of its previous membership gains, has stopped advertising and has reduced staffing at its Syracuse office. In light of the high costs of health care in Syracuse, the Metropolitan Development Association sponsored efforts to establish a community-wide health capacity planning process. Eighteen months of talks among hospitals, doctors and insurers led to a consensus to form a new organization, called the Health Care Planning Organization, that would examine health services use and capacity planning. However, there reportedly are significant concerns from the provider community that the Syracuse effort might simply mimic Excellus’ Rochester Community Technology Assessment Advisory Board, which reviews any addition to capacity in Rochester that costs $3 million or more. Because of concern about Excellus’ clout in the Syracuse market, representation for the new planning organization is carefully constructed to ensure that employers have the majority of the board’s representation and that hospitals and physicians each have double the representation of Excellus. In addition, Excellus is restricted to funding no more than a third of total costs for the planning effort. Although physicians and hospitals agreed to the formation of the new planning organization, it remains to be seen whether consensus concerning health planning can be ironed out given the conflicting interests of the stakeholders. While market observers concede that the Syracuse market has most likely met its natural limit for the number of facilities that the community can support, participants in the planning effort hope to limit the uncontrolled proliferation of any new technologies. Employers Prompt Clinical IT and Data Sharing Efforts
For example, two medical groups, Syracuse Orthopedic Specialists and Family Care Medical Group, have an electronic medical record and are in discussions with Community General Hospital of Syracuse about establishing a direct link so that medical information resulting from hospital services can be transmitted to a shared electronic record. In contrast to physicians, Syracuse hospitals are more actively developing information technology capabilities, but some hospitals report that physicians do not take advantage of their remote access to these information systems. St. Joseph’s Hospital Health Center has the highest physician use of its information system because the hospital does not maintain paper records more than 24 hours after patient discharge. In addition, to facilitate and encourage physicians to use the technology, St. Joseph’s implemented electronic sign-off of records and has dedicated staff who assist physicians in using the system. Meanwhile, employer efforts to improve quality and reduce costs in the market may face challenges from physicians and hospitals. The Manufacturer’s Association of Central New York (MACNY) formed a health care committee to develop recommendations to lower costs through improving quality and patient safety. Although not MACNY’s area of expertise, health care costs are routinely one of the top three concerns of employers based on MACNY’s annual survey of area employers. MACNY’s committee recommendations include development of data-sharing capabilities and a community-wide health information exchange. This information initiative for data exchange would be built around MetroNet, a hardwire cable that connects major institutions in Syracuse and reportedly is currently underutilized. In a separate effort, Onondaga County launched a medical record initiative that provides county employees with privacy-protected access to benefit and medical information, such as medications, allergies and family history. Through this effort, the county hopes to reduce costs by improving quality and coordination, for example, by reducing duplicative testing. After five months, more than 700 of roughly 5,000 employees and retirees had enrolled. However, the infrastructure for providers has not been developed to allow importing of laboratory or diagnostic imaging results, and no privacy agreement has been reached yet with providers in the community to allow access to the medical record. Although Excellus is supportive of this project, it has not allowed direct linkage to medical claims because of privacy concerns. The county is able to provide all of the employee’s medication history, including utilization and cost, because the county has direct access to pharmacy claims. Without a data link to physicians’ medical records, county employees and retirees typically print out the information from the county’s medical record at home and then take it with them to the doctor’s office. Both the MACNY and Onondaga County efforts face an uphill struggle in a market where providers may resist outside efforts to develop information technology. Physicians are reluctant to adopt new information technology because of high initial investment and ongoing support costs. There also is concern that existing software is simply not mature enough and lacks interoperability, especially across physician groups or between hospital and physicians. And given the numerous platforms and no consensus about the best platform, physicians are reluctant to abandon systems that meet their current claims billing needs. Moreover, not all of the hospitals view the community-wide health information exchange initiative favorably, because some hospitals see little value in broad data sharing within the community and prefer their own systems as a way to strengthen physicians’ affiliation with their hospital and thereby gain a competitive advantage. Safety Net Strained as Outpatient Capacity Shrinks
For example, Crouse Hospital discontinued several outpatient clinics as part of its bankruptcy restructuring. Community General Hospital also has shed some outpatient services, and Upstate University Hospital closed a site on the Onondaga Nation reservation, which Syracuse Community Health Center now operates. In addition, Excellus BlueCross BlueShield recently discontinued two outpatient clinics—known as Lifetime Health Medical Group—that were losing money. The clinics served about 20,000 patients, including many patients considered indigent. Although the Syracuse Community Health Center has been able to absorb some of this reduction in outpatient capacity—in some cases by taking over the operation of the discontinued clinics—the health center is strained because of increased demand from those clinics, a general rise in the number of uninsured people and cuts in grant funding. The health center has experienced some cash-flow problems and a resulting lack of reserves, making it difficult to invest in needed equipment and supplies or address longer term needs, like IT systems. Syracuse Community Health Center also has outsourced some services, such as pharmacy services. Also, its patients reportedly are experiencing longer waiting times for care. However, increases in uninsured and uncompensated care do not seem to be having a major impact on the capacity of local hospitals, all of which are doing well financially. Obtaining specialty care for low-income patients is viewed as extremely difficult in Syracuse, and may have grown somewhat worse over the past two years. Outpatient psychiatric services are among the specialty care services most often cited as being in short supply, and inpatient psychiatric care for children and adolescents became virtually unavailable in Syracuse after the closure of Four Winds Hospital in 2004. St. Joseph’s Hospital Health Center has specialty clinics for allergy, orthopedics, asthma, dermatology, and otolaryngology where doctors volunteer their time, but in the last year closed its otolaryngology and dermatology clinic. More specialists are refusing to take emergency department on-call coverage, especially ophthalmologists and plastic surgeons who have moved a lot of their services out of the hospital to outpatient settings. In addition, access to dental care for low-income persons continues to be a problem, despite recent increases in Medicaid reimbursement rates for dental care and the opening of new dental clinics geared toward Medicaid enrollees in the past two years. Medicaid Budget Remains Stable But Concerns Grow
However, public program enrollment increases also are contributing to budget problems at the local level. County governments in New York are responsible for up to about one-fourth of Medicaid costs. According to local media, higher than expected increases in Medicaid costs and large enrollment increases for Family Health Plus have forced Onondaga County to spend down reserves and raise local taxes in recent years. Rising costs of public pensions and health benefits for county employees also were cited as contributing to county budget problems. To cover the increased costs, Onondaga County increased its sales tax by 1 percentage point last year. To date, ongoing budget problems at the state and local level have not resulted in major cuts in public coverage programs and have had little or no effect on the safety net in Syracuse. Outreach programs continue to be active, and the facilitated enrollment program that uses community organizations to help individuals complete applications for Medicaid, Child Health Plus and Family Health Plus has continued. In April 2004, there was a change in Medicaid and Family Health Plus that allowed individuals to renew their eligibility by mail instead of requiring face-to-face interviews, making it easier for people to stay enrolled in Medicaid and Family Health Plus. Although public coverage programs have been maintained to date, Gov. Pataki has proposed an overhaul to the state’s Medicaid program. The plan, known as the Federal-State Health Reform Partnership (F-SHRP), is being proposed as an amendment to the state’s Section 1115 Medicaid waiver that would see increases in federal revenue of $500 million for each of the next three years in exchange for longer term cost containment. In addition, the governor’s proposal would limit and eventually reduce the local jurisdictions’ share in the cost of the Medicaid program, and by 2008 the state would take over administrative responsibility for the program entirely. F-SHRP also emphasizes reducing excess capacity in hospitals and nursing homes, shifting long-term care from institutional to community-based settings, and investment in information technology. To implement F-SHRP, the amendment would require final approval from the federal government and the state Legislature. Issues to Track
Important issues to track include:
Background Data
![]() The Community Tracking Study, the major effort of the Center for Studying Health System Change (HSC), tracks changes in the health system in 60 sites that are representative of the nation. This Community Report series documents the findings from the fifth round of site visits. Analyses based on site visit and survey data from the Community Tracking Study are published by HSC in Issue Briefs, Tracking Reports, Data Bulletins and peer-reviewed journals. Community Reports are published by the Center for Studying
Health System Change: 600 Maryland Avenue, SW, Suite 550 President: Paul B. Ginsburg |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||